The normal one, the trendy one and the risk: Decoding Milan’s coaching conundrum

The winds of change are blowing through the red and black half of Milan as AC Milan contemplates its coaching future. There is a growing sense that even if Pioli manages a Europa League triumph – the best possible outcome left for Milan this season – his tenure at the helm has simply run its course.

Let’s take a look at the three most likely scenarios in terms of linked managerial changes that have circulated with a comparison of potentially sticking with Pioli or choosing one of Motta or Conte to take Milan forward into the next iteration of the Rossoneri.

Stefano Pioli: The ‘Normal One’

Stefano Pioli has been at the helm of Milan for almost five years, a period marked by incremental progress and a return to the upper echelons of Italian football. The club’s resurgence under Pioli’s guidance has been attributed to his favoured formation – a dynamic 4-2-3-1 system, with a recent change to a 4-3-3.

This tactical consistency has provided the players with a sense of stability, allowing them to grow individually and as a team. Pioli’s 4-2-3-1 and more recently the 4-3-3 has seen Milan adopt a possession-based style with quick transitions. Often relying on Leao and Theo’s left-sided excellence and Giroud’s ‘bomber’ status in the box.

Pioli has shown adaptability by favouring new acquisitions in players such as Loftus-Cheek and Reijnders, natural box-to-box players that have evolved Pioli’s style. Moreover, his somewhat forced trust in youth this season due to injuries has shown he can trust in lesser-proven players when needed.

Pioli’s understanding of the club’s ethos, cultivated over his tenure, is an invaluable asset. The continuity he offers ensures that the current squad’s cohesion remains intact. The players are well-versed in his philosophy, and Pioli’s man-management skills have fostered a positive atmosphere within the dressing room.

However, the question remains whether Pioli can take the Rossoneri to the next level, or if his approach has reached its zenith.

Thiago Motta: Bologna’s Stylish 4-2-3-1

Thiago Motta’s coaching philosophy mirrors his playing days – dynamic, attacking, and possession-oriented. At Bologna, Motta has implemented a 4-2-3-1 formation that emphasizes high pressing and fluid positional play. The central midfield pairing is crucial for ball circulation, while the attacking trio aims to unlock defences through intricate combinations.

Motta’s system relies on the full-backs pushing high, and the wingers cutting inside to create overloads in central areas. The attacking midfielder operates between the lines, linking play and creating goal-scoring opportunities. The success of Motta’s approach hinges on players with technical proficiency and versatility.

For Milan, adopting Motta’s system would require a seamless transition and some minor potential personnel changes. The full-backs and central midfielders need to be adept at both defensive solidity and offensive contribution.

The question remains: Can Motta’s attacking philosophy be seamlessly integrated into Milan’s current squad, and will the players adapt to a more expansive style? Most importantly, will Motta be able to take the step to a top European club, especially with his ex-Inter cult status? He certainly seems to be the favourite.

Antonio Conte: The Pragmatic 3-5-2 Maestro

Antonio Conte is synonymous with the 3-5-2 formation, a system he has deployed successfully at Juventus, Chelsea, and Inter. The tactical setup involves three centre-backs, wing-backs providing width, and two central midfielders with attacking and defensive responsibilities.

Conte’s 3-5-2 is built on defensive solidity, rapid transitions, and exploiting wide areas. The wing-backs, often transformed full-backs, are vital in stretching opposition defences. The central midfield duo ensures a robust presence in the middle, and the two strikers form a dynamic partnership, creating overloads and exploiting defensive weaknesses.

For Milan, adopting Conte’s system would require a significant shift in personnel and playing style. The current squad, accustomed to a back four, may need time to adapt to the defensive responsibilities of wing-backs. Additionally, Conte’s system demands physical and tactically disciplined players, which might prompt changes in the current squad list.

Like Motta, another man who has not only won with Inter fairly recently, but also started the Juve 10-year dominance that arguably plagued Serie A with monotony; it is clear if Conte were to come, it would tell of a combination of self-indulgence from Conte, with the aim of becoming the first manager to win a Scudetto with the ‘Big 3 in Italy’ and a burning desire from management to stay competitive.

Even with the past ties to Milan’s biggest rivals, the true controversy of appointing Conte would be the volatility and almost inevitable air of instability that he would bring, which could spell disaster for a project that has clearly been built with sustainability in mind.

Conclusion

As Milan stand at the precipice of a coaching decision, the tactical implications loom large.
Stefano Pioli offers continuity and attacking prowess but an unabandoning sense of stagnation,
Thiago Motta promises a fresh, expansive approach but has riskiness and impatience plastered all
over it, and Antonio Conte’s 3-5-2 brings defensive solidity and a proven track record, but a kindling
spark that is just bound to blow up.

Although, the tactical implications are huge and will of course underpin the majority logic behind
who is appointed, especially as Milan are a club with only so many resources and an institution that
must use the tools it already has in the best way possible; it could be argued that the appointment
should start more from a character examination as it is clear Milan need a congenial leader and one
that fosters a real ‘Group’ as Milan’s new ‘Consultant’ Zlatan would attest to.

A supreme challenge for Moncada and Furlani surely lies in aligning each coach’s tactical philosophy with the current squad’s strengths and weaknesses. The decision will not only shape the team’s style of play but also determine how seamlessly the players adapt to a new era under their chosen leader.
The tactical chessboard awaits the masterstroke that could continue Milan’s journey to glory or
set it on a path of self-destruction.

More Stories about AC Milan

Monza 4-2 AC Milan: Five things we learned – anger, drama and encouragement

19 February 2024, 21:26

CM: Milan have no concerns about Leao’s condition after Monza worries

19 February 2024, 20:55

Fichajes: Milan may have identified their top attacking target for the summer mercato

19 February 2024, 20:35